Paper + People is a blog about the Smith College Museum of Art’s collection of over 18,000 prints, drawings, and photographs. Here you will find a diverse array of posts written by museum staff, students, scholars, and other paper enthusiasts about anything pertaining to the collection.
Any works you see featured here are available to view by appointment.
Tuesday, October 24, 2017
Chuck Close. American, born 1940. Lyle. 2003. 147 color silkscreen on paper. Image © Chuck Close, courtesy Pace Gallery. Gift of the artist and Pace Editions, Inc.
In this show, through a selection of portraiture in various media, I aim to emphasize the presence of veiled relationships and emotions present in a rendering of a person. Every portrait in itself is subjective—relative to both the image maker and the viewer’s own perception of the work. In other words, everything we encounter is prompted by an individual, unique interpretation—every person will interpret an event differently based on one’s distinct past experiences and history. In application, what an artist chooses to depict in an encounter with their sitter is only an impression, not representative of the whole person being captured, but solely how the image maker sees/relates to/emotes with them at a fixed moment in time—only capturing a fragment of their self. With the show consisting solely of various portraits, I urge the viewer to look deeper beneath the surface, and search for underlying ideologies and emotions that guide the presentation and one’s own reading of the work—thinking critically about what the portrait says not only about the sitter, but of the image maker and ourselves as viewers.
Thursday, October 19, 2017
Guest blogger Emma Crumbley, class of 2019, wrote this post as part of her coursework for ARH 280: Photography and the Politics of Invisibility taught by Post-Doctoral Fellow Anna Lee. This course informed the current exhibition A History of Handwork: Photographs from the SCMA Collection on view on the Museum’s second floor until December 3, 2017.
At the Lion's Cage was made in England in the 1870s, when photocollage was at the height of its popularity. The anonymous artist, only known as “J.F.,” was most likely an upper class British woman Victorian photocollage was almost exclusively made by upper class and aristocratic British women, and was intended to be circulated among a close circle of friends and family, so it makes sense that J.F. did not sign her whole name. Although this image seems simple at first--an amateur drawing of a lion in a cage next to cut out photographs of two bored looking girls-- J.F. has used symbolic elements of Victorian culture to infuse it with meaning. J.F. would have cut the photographs of the girls out of a portrait in order to place them into her drawing of the zoo. Her decision to create a photocollage set in the zoo is reflective of the high society in which she likely lived. Not only an important arena for aristocratic socializing, the zoo itself was a monument to the way in which humans were able to dominate over even the fiercest of wild animals, reflecting the imperialist attitudes from which the British aristocracy benefited. In At the Lion’s Cage, the young girls’ blasé response to the lion roaring at them could be a reflection of the distance that visitors in Victorian zoos felt from the animals in captivity, which itself could be seen as reminiscent, whether or not J.F. wished it to be, of the distance between the aristocracy and the people who were oppressed by Britain’s imperialism.
J. F. English, 19th century. At the Lion's Cage. c.1870s. Photo-collage with pen and ink on cardstock. Gift of Judith Antevil Nygren, class of 1959, and Edward Nygren.
J.F.’s decision to place these girls next to the lion is also perhaps a reflection on her own oppression as a woman in Victorian England. At this time, cats were frequently pictured alongside women and girls, and used as a warning to women who desired to be free of the confines of domesticity; they were wild creatures who lived at the whim of their untamed sexuality and innate immorality. The inclusion of the lion, then, as the biggest, strongest cat of all being kept in a miserable, tiny cage, is symbolic of the faults that J.F. found in these sexist claims. Alongside the lion, the two young girls, standing with open land spread out behind them, represent a freedom that most aristocratic Victorian women only felt in childhood--before they married, had children, and were burdened with the labor of domesticity and social fluency. Perhaps within this direct contrast between the freedom of youth and the captivity of adult womanhood, with the aristocratic zoo as a backdrop, is a statement which J.F., was able to hint at in this seemingly simple image.
Wednesday, October 4, 2017
The Student Picks Sweepstakes ended on September 24, and we have our seven winners!
Student Picks gives students the chance to curate their own personal, individual art show using works from the Museum, on view for one day in the Cunningham Center for Prints, Drawings and Photographs. Six lucky students are chosen by lottery as part of a campus-wide sweepstakes that takes place each September.
Image: Lorraine O’Grady. American, born 1934. Art Is... (Troupe with Mlle Bourgeoise Noire). 1983 (printed 2009). C-print. Purchased with the Dorothy C. Miller, class of 1925, Fund.
Starting this year, Student Picks is part of the museum's new Thursday Late Nights programming and will be taking place on the last Thursday of each month of the academic year.
We picked three winners and an alternate each from the paper and online ballots.
This year’s Student Picks winners are ...
October 26, 2017: Ana Porro '19
November 30, 2017: Kaila Temple '18
January 25, 2018: Yasmine Vera '20
February 22, 2018: Katie O'Hara '18
March 29, 2018: Samantha Linder '18
April 26, 2018: Nicole Bearden '19J
September 27, 2018: Molly Megan '19
Congratulations to our newest student curators!