..............................................................................................................................................................

 
Smith in 2020: Innovative But Tradition-Minded
 
By John Sippel
 
............................
 
Ruth Bader Ginsburg Receives First Sophia Smith Award
 
WNBA Notes Smith's Role in Women's Basketball
 
Plath Beyond the Plinth
 
Smithellanea: Dodging Flak from Click and Clack
 
............................
Fearless in trekking new intellectual realms. Thoroughly international in its student body, faculty and curriculum. Deeply supportive of social diversity. Supremely conducive to rigorous, creative thought and the toppling of walls between academic disciplines. Endlessly resourceful in bringing a proud tradition and standard of scholarship to bear in exciting new contexts. The finest liberal arts college in the country.
 
Smith College can and should be all of these things a quarter century from now, according to "Envisioning Our Future," a draft report prepared by the steering committee for the college's self-study project called Smith 2020. The project, an offshoot of the preparation done for the decennial reaccreditation review that Smith is undergoing this fall, aims to ensure that the college embarks on the next several decades with full deliberation, strength, and sense of mission. The report is the result of many months of work by the committee, which was chaired by President Ruth J. Simmons. It outlines a long list of recommended initiatives drawn from some 200 ideas submitted by Smith faculty, students and staff.
 
Asked what the college should strive to be in the year 2020, the Smith community responded with a broad range of comments and proposals. The committee grouped these ideas in a way "that seemed to offer the greatest promise of relevance and the greatest potential for success."
 
The steering committee saw as one of its primary responsibilities the safeguarding of the "position of enviable strength" it feels Smith now enjoys. In assessing possible threats to that standing, the group "could find no present nor imminent danger that fundamentally threatens the future well-being of the college," and was therefore in the happy position of being "able to focus its attention on areas of promise and potential that could be built on the substantial strengths already in place."
 
The committee's report includes a number of proposals on faculty development and campus life, but overwhelmingly concentrates on curriculum. The curriculum review touches on women in science and technology; Smith's commitment to international scholarship; new kinds of student internships; cross-discipline learning; essential skills for the next century; graduate education; and infrastructure issues.
 
Early in this long section the committee urges the college to hone its ability to rapidly introduce course work in emerging fields, including some of the interdisciplinary sciences that are beginning to have such a decisive impact in medicine and elsewhere. The committee also endorses several dozen curricular initiatives, the most dramatic of which include a study on the establishment of an undergraduate engineering program at Smith; new programs to promote scientific, quantitative and computer literacy; a host of proposals for encouraging more study abroad, more international students at Smith, and a more consistently international perspective in curricula; the building of bridges between disciplines by way of an interdisciplinary institute that would bring together a diverse array of visiting scholars, public figures, critics, writers, performers and scientists; and a new endowment to support the growth and greater use of the Sophia Smith Collection.
The second major section of the report deals with faculty excellence and breadth. It endorses an enhanced visiting scholars' program, the review and possible reconfiguration of faculty workloads, and expanded technical and technological support for teaching and research.
The report's third and final section deals with Smith as a scholarly community. It includes proposals on residential life, campus social life, facilities for nonresident students, seminars for first-year students (see story, page 8), student business services, spiritual life, athletics and fitness. It also calls for measures to build student leadership skills and encourage greater social and educational diversity in campus life.
 
The faculty reviewed preliminary drafts of the steering committee's report in the spring, and this fall will offer specific responses to some of the report's recommendations. The report will go on to be evaluated by appropriate campus committees and the board of trustees.
"The goal of this report was to outline broadly the areas which, taken together, the committee thought offered the greatest promise to enhance the overall quality of education offered at Smith," the steering committee notes in its conclusion. "However, given the breadth of these endeavors, this report can only serve to introduce and outline the rich opportunities that lie ahead."

..............................................................................................................................................................

Back to the Smith College home page | Back to NewsSmith's home page